 |
RETURN TO TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Winter 2002
Panel:
"Substantial"
Evidence Links CFS, Immune System
Published research clearly suggests that immune system dysfunction
plays
a role in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), according to a panel report from a CFS
symposium held late last fall.
The symposium, the third in a series on
CFS, was sponsored by The Chronic Fatigue and Immune Dysfunction Syndrome
(CFIDS) Association of America, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on
Women's Health (ORWH). The series is designed to examine the role of the
neurological, endocrine, circulatory and immune systems in CFS.
The panel
listened to reports on CFS research from 10 doctors and scientists (see box
below), then met to formulate answers to five
questions:
-
What is the evidence that there is dysregulation of the
immune system in CFS?
-
Are there examples or models of immune dysfunction that
could lead to the symptoms of CFS?
-
What is the evidence of the involvement of infectious
agents in CFS?
-
What can we learn from the existing data on interactions
among the immune system, HPA axis and autonomic nervous system about the
clinical presentations of CFS?
-
What are the recommendations for future research? What
are the recommended opportunities for research collaboration? What
methodological barriers are there to the careful study of these
recommendations?
The panel has completed a final statement on its findings. To preserve
the ability to publish the final statement in the medical literature, the
complete document is not yet available. However, after the symposium panel
members agreed that:
-
The immune system is involved in CFS. There has
been substantial published evidence that a large proportion of CFS patients
have immunological abnormalities, including increased natural killer cell
activity, increased number or activated T cells, decreased lymphocyte
stimulation and increased production of some pro-inflammatory cytokines, which
act as chemical messengers between cells. The panel noted that the ability to
understand the exact role these changes play in the development of CFS is
constrained by major limitations in the studies conducted to
date.
-
Infections may also play a role. The panel concluded that
direct and indirect evidence points to the involvement of active viral or
bacterial infections in the development of some cases of CFS, although no
single agent has been found in all patients. For example, studies have found
persistent activity of Epstein-Barr virus and/or human herpesvirus 6 in up to
30% of CFS patients.
-
CFS is a multisystem disorder. In addition to the immune
system, the endocrine and autonomic nervous systems may be implicated in CFS.
There is some evidence that CFS is associated with underactivity of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which could explain findings of
upregulation of the immune system and an increase in circulating cytokines.
-
More research is needed to define the immunological
aspects of CFS. The panel outlined future research needs, including multiple
site, longitudinal studies to: explore the possible association of infectious
agents with the immunological profile seen in CFS; link immunological findings
to symptoms and functional disability; and explore the use of
anti-inflammatory cytokines, antivirals, antibiotics and immunomodulatory
agents in the treatment of CFS. Panelists also suggested ways to overcome
research barriers, such as establishing standardized methodology to
differentiate between latent infections normally present in most individuals
and those that are more frequently activated and associated with CFS symptoms.
Panel members say they were pleased with the symposium and its results.
"It was a well-organized and well structured scientific meeting focusing on
important questions," said Gerhard Krueger, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas
Health Science Center at Houston. "The outcome -- as I see it -- was clear and
should further assist in clarifying the pathogenesis of
CFS."
Highlights from Symposium
Presenters A number of problems have hampered CFS
immunological research - including the lack of longitudinal studies to capture
the fluctuations in symptoms and immune function; the need to control for the
possibility that neuroendocrine and autonomic abnormalities underlie
immunological abnormalities; and the inappropriate practice of combining
patients with various onset types, illness durations and comorbid conditions in
studies and then attempting to draw conclusions across the subgroups.
By
thinking about potential confounds and problems, researchers who presented at
the latest CFS symposium have made some important findings that should clarify
prior findings and launch new initiatives in understanding CFS. Below are
summaries of three presentations:
-
It is not uncommon for symptoms to linger for six months
or more following infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Q fever or
Ross-River virus, according to Andrew Lloyd, MD, of the University of New
South Wales, Australia. His research group is studying people with these
infections as a model for a post-infective CFS. His data demonstrate "that
symptomatic manifestations are actually quite common for quite a prolonged
period after these infections, which have been thought to be short-lived,
lasting three to six weeks at most." Approximately 10 percent remain ill at
six months, five percent at 12 months and one to two percent at 24 months.
Lloyd anticipates that future work will identify predictors for both early and
delayed recovery.
-
Ron Glaser, MD, from Ohio State University discussed his
hypothesis that partial reactivation of herpes viruses, like EBV, may induce
immune and cytokine dysregulation and produce the CFS symptom complex in a
subset of CFS patients. Data on the immunological consequences of stress in
astronauts, medical students and spouses/caregivers of Alzheimer's patients
indicate that stressful situations may induce partial reactivation of latent
EBV. If viral reactivation is incomplete, it may hamper the ability to link a
particular virus to CFS using standard PCR techniques. Dr. Glaser's group is
studying several EBV enzymes in an effort to link latent EBV infection, under
certain circumstances, to CFS and other
illnesses.
-
Interferon alpha is known to be a potent inducer of
CFS-like symptoms. Andrew Miller, MD, and his colleagues at Emory University
have found that pretreatment with an antidepressant in patients undergoing
interferon alpha treatment for malignant melanoma prevented symptoms such as
depression, anxiety, head and muscle aches and cognitive changes, but did not
alter the development of fatigue and anorexia-type symptoms. The fatigue and
anorexia symptoms preceded the mood-based symptoms and seemed to be more
resistant to treatment. A similar response to antidepressants occurs in CFS,
lending additional validity to Miller's work to develop a model for CFS based
on interferon alpha administration.
Immunology Symposium
Participants
Panel
Timothy Gerrity,
PhD (co-chair) Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington, D.C.
Dimitris A. Papanicolaou,
MD (co-chair) Emory University Atlanta, Ga.
Jay D. Amsterdam, MD University
of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pa.
Stephen Bingham, PhD VA Maryland
Health Care System Perry Point, Md.
Ashley Grossman, MD St.
Bartholomew's Hospital London, U.K.
Terry Hedrick, PhD CFS patient,
research methodologist Cobb Island, Md.
Ronald B. Herberman,
MD University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pa.
Gerhard Krueger, MD,
PhD University of Texas Houston, Texas
Susan Levine, MD Private
Practice New York, N.Y.
Nahid Mohagheghpour, PhD Stanford
Research Institute Menlo Park, Calif.
Rebecca C. Moore College student
and person with CFS Hyde Park, N.Y.
James Oleske, MD University
Hospital Newark, N.J.
Christopher R. Snell,
PhD University of the Pacific Stockton, Calif.
Facilitator
Mike Kaplan Kaplan &
Company Charlottesville, Va.
Speakers
Joseph Cannon, PhD Medical
College of Georgia Augusta, Ga.
Daniel J. Clauw, MD Georgetown
University Medical Center Washington, D.C.
Sam Donta, MD Boston VA Medical
Center Boston, Mass.
M. Ronald Glaser, PhD Ohio State
University Columbus, Ohio
Sidney Grossberg, MD Medical
College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wis.
Andrew Lloyd, MD University of
New South Wales Sydney, Australia
Kevin Maher, PhD University of
Miami School of Medicine Miami, Fla.
William B. Malarkey, MD Ohio
State University Columbus, Ohio
Andrew Miller, MD Emory
University Atlanta, Ga. Robert Shapiro, MD,
PhD University of Vermont Burlington, Vt.
Speaker, Sunday evening Panel
address
Anthony L. Komaroff,
MD Harvard Health
Publications Harvard Medical School Boston, Mass.
Moderator, Methodology Workshop
Nancy Klimas, MD University of Miami School of
Medicine Miami, Fla.
Planning Committee
Laurence A. Bradley,
PhD University of Alabama at
Birmingham Birmingham, Ala.
Ilia J. Elenkov, MD, PhD Georgetown University Medical
Center Washington, D.C.
Tim Gerrity, PhD Georgetown University Medical
Center Washington, D.C.
M. Ronald Glaser, MD Ohio State University Columbus,
Ohio
Eleanor Hanna, PhD National Institutes of
Health Bethesda, Md.
Leonard A. Jason, PhD DePaul University Chicago, Ill.
Nancy G. Klimas, MD University of Miami School of
Medicine Miami, Fla.
Andrew Miller, MD Emory University Atlanta, Ga
Dimitris A. Papanicolaou, MD Emory University Atlanta,
Ga.
Peter C. Rowe, MD Johns Hopkins University Baltimore,
Md.
David Robertson, MD Vanderbilt University Nashville,
Tenn.
|